engin logo
   
 Academics    
 
 

ENGR 090 (E90) Homepage 2007-8


2007-2008 ENGR 090 Projects
Group Title Advisor
Paul Agyiri
Tristan Lawson
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
Topic Selection
Proposal
Report
Everbach/
Cheever
Allison Barlow Personal Remote Display
Topic Selection
Proposal
Report
Cheever
Alexander Benn
Molly Piels
Keycard Entry System for Hicks
Topic Selection
Proposal
Report
Cheever
Rebecca Burrow In Depth Analysis of Simple Reinforced Concrete
Topic Selection
Proposal
Report
Siddiqui
Christopher Caruso
Samuel Garcia
Steel Bridge Design
Topic Selection
Proposal
Report
Siddiqui
Omer Corluhan Campus Energy Analysis
Topic Selection
Proposal
Report
Everbach
Marie Cosgrove-Davies
Lauren Goodfriend
Portable Whole-Plant Photosynthesis Measurement System
Topic Selection
Proposal
Report
McGarity
Scott Fortmann-Roe CAD/Simulation for Environmental Solutions McGarity
David German

Computing Hardware for Accelerated Training of Neural Networks
Topic Selection
Proposal
Report

Moreshet
Seth Hara
Anima Singh
Wireless Patient Monitoring Device
Topic Selection
Proposal
Report
Cheever
Jonathon Harris Automatic Sail-Setter
Topic Selection
Proposal
Report
Orthlieb
Patrick Lindsey Hydrologic Model of a Constructed Wetland
Topic Selection
Proposal
Report
McGarity
Jonathon Shoop Underwater Remotely Operated Vehicle
Topic Selection
Proposal
Report
Everbach


2007-2008 ENGR 090 Schedule
Time and Place To be completed
Friday, September 7, 2007 at 3:00 pm
Papazian 324
First ENGR 090 Meeting of Seniors for general information, and to distribute and discuss project topics suggested by faculty. 
Monday, September 24 at 7:00 p.m.
Hicks 211
Project Proposal Preparation Seminar
Friday, September 28 by 3:00 pm
Electronic (PDF (preferred) or WORD) and paper copy to the departmental Administrative Assistant in Hicks 203, NOT to your advisor.
ENGR 090 Topic Selection Memo/Background Paper Submission
Thursday, October 4 at 7:00 p.m.
Hicks 211
Project Planning Seminar
Tuesday, October 23rd at 7:00 p.m.
Hicks 211
Realistic Design Constraints Seminar
Friday November 16 by 3:00 pm
To the departmental AA in Hicks 203
Draft ENGR 090 Project Proposal Due with CPM (Critical Path Method) Schedule
Wednesday, December 5 at Noon
Electronic (PDF (preferred) or WORD)and paper copy to the departmental Administrative Assistant in Hicks 203, NOT to your advisor.
Final ENGR 090 Project Proposal Due, with Cpm Schedule, Equipment List and Bill of Materials.
Monday, March 24 evening, and
Tuesday, March 25, 2008 evening
Hicks 211, 8:00 p.m - 10:00 pm
(tentative venue and time)

Mid-semester Project Status Presentations

Each student must attend at least one complete evening session.

Friday, April 18 at Noon
to the departmental AA in Hicks 203
NOT to your advisor.
Draft ENGR 090 Project Report Due
April 21 to May 4 PRACTICE PRESENTATIONS - At the discretion of your advisor
Monday, May 5 and
Tuesday, May 6
Hicks 312, 8:30 am - 5:00 pm

ENGR 090 Project Presentations

  Attendance Required at all sessions
  Business Dress for presenters

Tuesday , May 6 (early evening) Dinner for seniors
Thursday, May 8, 2007 at Noon
Electronic (PDF (preferred) or WORD)and paper copy to the departmental Administrative Assistant in Hicks 203, NOT to your advisor.
FINAL ENGR 090 Project Report Due

Please note that an unexcused failure to meet any of the schedule deadlines can result in a substantial grade penalty - these deadlines are Hard and Fast, and very important for the timely conduct and completion of your projects.

Attendance Policies

  • Attendance at all ENGR 090 seminars, mid-semester and final project presentations is mandatory.
  • Those unable to comply with a deadline or attendance requirement must excuse themselves by email sent to the chair, your advisor and the departmental AA, AND negotiate an acceptable alternative at least 72 hours in advance.
  • Students are expected to meet weekly with their project advisor or advisors.

Comprehensive Examination Description

Engineering 90, Senior Design Project, is the Comprehensive Examination in the Department of Engineering. The nature of the comprehensive examination has not been substantively changed since the early 1970's. Students work on a design project that is the culminating exercise for all senior Engineering majors. Under the guidance of a faculty member, students investigate a problem of their choice in an area of interest to them. A comprehensive written report and an oral presentation are required. Submission and oral presentation of the Final Project Report in Engineering Design constitutes the comprehensive examination for majors in Engineering.

Engineering 90 actually begins in the fall of the senior year. Students meet regularly throughout the semester to identify a project topic and a faculty advisor, to prepare draft and final proposals, to complete preliminary studies for feasibility, etc., and to order equipment and supplies necessary for the project. During the spring, students meet with their faculty advisors weekly (or more frequently if necessary) for assistance and project updates. Students must submit both draft and final project reports. Further, students are required to deliver formal oral presentations of their projects on the two days following the last day of classes in the spring. All seniors are required to attend these presentations. At the conclusion of the presentations, faculty meet and discuss each of the projects individually, and reach consensus as to which students have passed the comprehensive exam. Grades in ENGR 090 are assigned by the faculty advisor(s) for the project, but the oral project presentation evaluations by all other departmental faculty are included among the considerations that faculty use in determining a student's final ENGR 090 grade.

It is important to note that a student can pass ENGR 090 without passing the Comprehensive Exam, and that this situation does occur. Students who do not pass the Comprehensive Exam during their first attempt fall into two categories, though we do not specifically name these categories. A student may fail the exam due to significant shortcomings in his/her design project, and not be permitted to graduate in the spring when s/he was registered for ENGR 090. In that case, the student has the option to return at a later time (the following summer or academic year) and repeat ENGR 090 in order to pass the Comprehensive Exam. In the second situation, a student does not pass the exam because progress on the project is insufficient, but does not dramatically fall short of the threshold for passing the Comprehensive. In that case, the student is offered an option to pass and graduate at the conclusion of the semester during which s/he was registered for ENGR 090, conditional upon meeting terms laid out by faculty in the department. The procedure in this situation is as follows. After consultation with the other departmental faculty, the faculty advisor informs the student (in writing) of the exact nature of the shortcomings in the project, with a proposed plan to meet the requirements during the weeks (typically, three or more) between the oral presentations of ENGR 090 and the deadline for submitting grades for seniors. A second faculty member from the department, with expertise related to the project, joins the original advisor as an additional advisor to the student. In order to pass the Comprehensive Exam, the student must first agree to the terms of the additional work required as laid out by the departmental faculty, and second, convince both advisors that s/he has met these terms. A second oral examination is not usually required in cases where passing the Comprehensive is conditional upon additional work, though the option exists if faculty feel that it would be appropriate.